Christian Louboutin comemora 20 anos de marca com festa no centro de São Paulo « Vogue: moda, desfiles, beleza, lifestyle e shopping saor christian louboutin
Обувь для женщин
christian louboutin snakeskin pumps
christian louboutin kiilat
christian louboutin menn sko
Christian Louboutin comemora 20 anos de marca com festa no centro de São Paulo
Por REDAÇÃO - 06/11/2011
O famoso designer de sapatos Christian Louboutin, que ganha festa da Vogue em São Paulo
Christian Louboutin e festas combinam tanto quanto um par de sapatos dele e um little black dress. Por isso mesmo o designer francês ganha uma comemoração em torno dos 20 anos de sua marca na próxima quarta-feira (09.11), em São Paulo. Organizada pela Vogue, a festa acontece no bar e clube noturno Alberta#3, localizado no centro da capital paulista – Louboutin pediu para que o evento fosse feito em um lugar fora do circuito fashion na cidade. Foi atendido, claro.
A festa tem início às 23h30. Trata-se de uma late party, já que durante a tarde Louboutin faz o lançamento de livro homônimo para clientes em sua loja no shopping Iguatemi e depois segue para o brinde que dá o start no seminário Hot Luxury, do International Herald Tribune, no hotel Unique.
Suzy Menkes no Brasil: o jantar de Donata Meirelles em torno da editora de moda
Entre os convidados que já confirmaram presença estão Diane von Furstenberg, Mario Testino, Francisco Costa e Suzy Menkes (que, por sua vez, recebe todos eles no palco do ciclo de palestras de moda mais tarde). É bom que escolham os sapatos certos para a comemoração – de outro modo, podem sair carregados, como aconteceu com Blake Lively na última semana, em festa do designer de sapatos em Nova York.
Blake Lively sai carregada por Louboutin de festa de lançamento
Making of: os bastidores das fotos para o livro de Christian Louboutin
Para Louboutin, usar salto alto é como ter um orgasmo
Christian Louboutin pode perder a patente que protege suas solas vermelhas
Christian Louboutin teria contratado detetive que espionou a Christian Dior
Join or log in to Facebook
Insuring the Uninsurable
The debate over Obama's contraceptive mandate pits conscience against coercion.
(Page 2 of 2)
Fine, but what’s it got to do with insurance?
Thankful for Property Rights on Thanksgiving Day
Tonite: Watch Debate About Free Trade with Don Boudreaux and Rick Manning
Forget Price Gouging: Businesses React Altruistically To Disasters
MORE ARTICLES BY
Real Common Sense on Gun Control
Government Protection From Russian Misinformation Would Be 'Cure' Far Worse Than Disease
The Truth About Niger
- Barack Obama
- Barbara Boxer
“Some 99% of women in the U.S. who are or have been sexually
active at some point in their lives have used birth control,
including 98% of Catholic women, according to the Guttmacher
Fine, but what’s it got to do with—oh never mind. I’ll answer
myself: It’s got nothing to do with insurance.
Insurance arose as a way for individuals to pool their risk of
some low-probability/high-cost misfortune befalling them.
It shouldn’t be necessary to point this out, but coming of
child-bearing age and choosing to use contraception is not an
insurable event. It’s a volitional act. It may have good
consequences for the person taking the action and society at large,
but it is still a volitional act. It makes no sense to talk about
insuring against the eventuality that a particular person will use
contraception. Strictly speaking, contraception has nothing to do
Unfortunately, we don’t speak strictly about health insurance.
One reason we don’t is the tax code. Since World War II
compensation for labor in the form of employment-based health
insurance does not count as taxable income. (Money spent
independently on health insurance does count.) The tax code thus
creates perverse incentives to 1) depend on one’s employer for
medical insurance, 2) shift income from liquid cash to restricted
insurance benefits, and 3) define uninsurable events as insurable.
Would someone care to explain how well-baby care can be
So we have taxation to thank for yet another feature of the
modern world: the corruption of language. In the medical realm
insurance no long means insurance.
Instead it’s a game by which we get other people to pay for
stuff. Well, that’s not quite accurate. It’s actually a game in
which we pretend that other people pay for stuff. Look,
contraception, mammograms, colonoscopies, and well-baby care are
not free. (See my “There’s No Such Thing as
a Free Mammogram.”) They require labor and resources for which
the owners wish—not unreasonably—to be compensated. Someone has
to pay. If employers are compelled nominally to pay for the
coverage, does anyone seriously doubt that employees will actually
pay through lower cash wages? Employers are not charities. So even
without a copayment, we all know deep down that we as workers pay
for the coverage. (Which by the way is likely to be more expensive
than the services would be in a freed market, since insurance
companies will charge overhead and more for their trouble. Also
subsidized demand raises prices.) Nevertheless, the truth is so
obscured that people can pretend they’re getting something for
So the government-generated system treats us like children, and
alas most of us seem happy to be treated that way.
Under pressure, the Obama administration was expected to
“compromise” under which exempt Catholic employers would not
have to pay for contraception coverage. Instead, insurance
companies would provide the coverage directly to employees. Since
under Health and Human Services rules, this coverage must be free,
the Obama administration is in effect directing insurers to eat the
cost. But insurers are profit-making companies, not charities, so
we may expect them to pass the cost to someone else. But to whom?
There’s only one possibility: nonexempt employers, which means in
fact employees of nonexempt companies. So the grand compromise
shifts the cost from a small minority of employees to the vast
majority — all in the name of religious freedom. All workers in
nonexempt companies and institutions will take a pay cut.
Sheldon Richman is editor of The Freeman, where this article
Sheldon Richman is executive editor of The Libertarian Institute and chairman of the board of trustees of the Center for a Stateless Society. He blogs at Free Association and has authored several books including, most recently, America's Counter-Revolution: The Constitution Revisited.
Media Contact Reprint Requests
Please Support Reason’s 2017 Webathon Today!
VIEW COMMENTS (183) | LEAVE A COMMENT
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.